The Leader vs Manager debate

Why do managers continue to get demonised? This recent Linkedin post is a good example.

Is it really the case of that you're either one or the other? The OED definition of a manager is “a person responsible for controlling or administering an organisation or group of staff". There’s nothing in this definition antithetical to leadership. The assumption that leaders and managers are polar opposites is absurd. There are strong and weak versions of both. A weak leader doesn't simply equal manager.

Management and leadership skills complement one another. Regrettably they’re not always found in equal measure. I’ve come across a number of leaders – charismatic, visionary, motivational, people focused – who fail dismally at day-to-day management. Their lack of training, expertise or inclination to manage doesn’t detract from their leadership but it does mean that they need to rely on individuals with stronger organisational skills in order to get things done. Good leaders will be sufficiently self-aware to recognise this skills deficit and ensure they have the necessary support. I’ve also had the privilege to work with and for leaders who are exemplary managers. They inspire performance but, crucially, also ensure this energy translates into actions that deliver results. This is both strong leadership and good management.

Business, rightly, celebrates leadership and leaders. Every organisation needs those who can inspire and motivate others to perform and achieve but these same organisations also need management professionals, with hard skills, who ensure that vision and strategy translate into plans, actions and outcomes. Ultimately it maybe leadership that lights fires but it’s sound management that keeps them burning.